Read Philosophies
Philosophers by area
Learn about Philosophy
History of Philosophy
Eastern Philosophy
Applied Philosophy
Photographs of Famous People
Literature Classics
Famous Quotations
Quotable Store
Quotable Mall
Sister Sites
Resources
History of Western Philosophy
Ancient Philosophy
History of Western philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Western philosophy has a long history. Conventionally divided into three large
eras - the Ancient, Medieval and Modern. The Ancient era runs through the fall
of Rome and includes the Greek philosophers such as Plato. The Medieval period
runs until roughly the late 1400s and the Renaissance. The "Modern" is a word
with more varied use, which includes everything from Post-Medieval through the
specific period of the early 20th century.
Brief timeline
Ancient philosophy
Western Philosophy is generally said to begin in the Greek cities of western
Asia Minor (Ionia) with Thales of Miletus, who was active around 585 B.C. and
left us the opaque dictum, "All is water." His most noted students were
Anaximenes of Miletus and Anaximander ("All is air").
Other thinkers and schools appeared throughout Greece over the next couple of
centuries. Among the most important were:
* Heraclitus, who stressed the transitory and chaotic nature of all things
("All is fire"; "We cannot step into the same river twice").
* Anaxagoras, who asserted that reality was so ordered that it must be in
all respects governed by Mind.
* The Pluralists and Atomists (Empedocles, Democritus) who tried to
understand the world as composite of innumerable interacting parts; and
the Eleatics Parmenides and Zeno who both insisted that All is One and
change is impossible. Parmenides and his school emphasized the enduring,
peduring, and absolute character of the world and of truth. ("To be is,
to not be is not.")
* The Sophists, traveling professional teachers of varied philosophical
affinity, became known (perhaps unjustly) for claiming that truth was
no more than opinion and for teaching people to argue fallaciously to
prove whatever conclusions they wished.
This whole movement gradually became more concentrated in Athens, which had
become the dominant city-state in Greece.
There is considerable discussion about why Athenian culture encouraged
philosophy, but one popular theory says that it occurred because Athens had
a direct democracy. It's known from Plato's writings that many sophists
maintained schools of debate, were respected members of society, and were
well paid by their students. It's also well known that orators had tremendous
influence on Athenian history, possibly even causing its failure (See
Battle of Miletus). One other theory for the popularity of philosophical
debate in Athens was due to the use of slavery there - the workforce,
mainly slaves, performed the labour that otherwise would have been taken up
by the male population of the city. Freed from working in the fields or in
productive activity, they were then free to engage in the assemblies of
Athens, and spend long hours discussing popular philosophical questions.
The theory fills in the blanks by saying that the Sophists' students wanted
to acquire the skills of an orator in order to influence the Athenian
Assembly, and thereby grow wealthy and respected. Since winning debates led
to wealth, the subjects and methods of debate became highly developed.
The key figure in transforming Greek philosophy into a unified and
continuous project - the one still being pursued today - is Socrates, who
studied under several Sophists. He then spent much of his life, we are
told, engaging everyone in Athens in discussion trying to determine whether
anyone had a very good idea what they were talking about, especially when
they talked about important matters like justice, beauty and truth. He
wrote nothing, but inspired many disciples. In his old age he became the
focus of the hostility of many in the city who saw philosophy and sophistry,
interchangeably, as destroying the piety and moral fiber of the city; he
was executed in 399 B.C.
His most important student was Plato, who wrote a number of philosophical
dialogues using his master's methods of inquiry to examine problems. The
early dialogues demonstrate something like Socrates' own fairly inconclusive
style of inquiry. The "middle" ones develop a substantive metaphysical and
ethical system to resolve these problems. Central ideas are the Theory of
Forms, that the mind is imbued with an innate capacity to understand and
apply concepts to the world, and that these concepts are in a significant
way more real, or more basically real, than the things of the world around
us; the immortality of the soul, and the idea that it too is more important
than the body; the idea that evil is a kind of ignorance, that only
knowledge can lead to virtue, that art should be subordinate to moral
purposes, and that society should be ruled by a class of philosopher
kings. In the later dialogues Socrates figures less prominently, and the
Theory of Forms is cast in doubt; more directly ethical questions become
the focus. Interestingly, in his most famous work, The Republic Plato
attacks the system of democracy, blaming it for the defeat of Athens in
the Peloponnesian War - he attributes the indecision of the masses (who
voted on everything, including military strategy) as the reason for military
defeat. He proposed instead a three tiered structure of society, with
workers, guardians and philosophers, in ascending order of importance
(convenient for him and his disciples, clearly), citing the philosophers
greater knowledge of the forms as the reason for them being more
appropiate in running society.
Plato founded the Academy of Athens, and his most outstanding student
there was Aristotle. Possibly Aristotle's most important and long-lasting
work was his formalization of logic. It appears that Aristotle was the
first philosopher to categorize every valid syllogism. A syllogism is a
form of argument that is guaranteed to be accepted, because it is known
(by all educated persons) to be valid. A crucial assumption in
Aristotelian logic is that it has to be about real objects. Two of
Aristotle's syllogisms are invalid to modern eyes. For example, "All
A are B. All A are C. Therefore, some B are C." This syllogism fails
if set A is empty.
Bibliography
Introductions and anthologies
* Classics of Western Philosophy by Steven M. Cahn Available from Amazon.com
* Philosophic Classics: From Plato to Derrida (4th Edition) by Forrest E. Baird Available from Amazon.com
* The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers by Will Durant Available from Amazon.com
* From Socrates to Sartre: The Philosophic Quest by T. Z. Lavine Available from Amazon.com
* Basic Teachings of the Great Philosophers by S. E. Frost Available from Amazon.com
* The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell Available from Amazon.com
* The Great Philosophers (4 vols.) by Karl Jaspers Available from Amazon.com
* A History of Philosophy in the Twentieth Century by Christian Delacampagne Available from Amazon.com
Reference
* A History of Western Philosophy (5 vols.) by W. T. Jones Available from Amazon.com
* History of Philosophy (9 vols.) by Frederick Copleston Available from Amazon.com
* History of Philosophy Quarterly (magazine) Available from Amazon.com
